General Questions about the Journal
Questions about Submitting Your Work to ANNALS
General Questions about the Journal
Is ANNALS a double-blind peer-reviewed journal?
ANNALS is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal. Only the editors see the CVs, not the reviewers.
What kinds of papers does ANNALS publish?
ANNALS publishes integrative reviews of research in management and related areas. Integrative reviews are understood as reviews of the literature that move beyond description of a body of evidence to derive new insights through integration and/or critique. ANNALS reviews present a clear perspective on the literature that has value-added in terms of theoretical and/or methodological take-aways.
What kinds of papers does ANNALS not publish? How are ANNALS papers different from AMR papers?
ANNALS does not publish opinion papers, empirical papers, or meta-analyses. While ANNALS asks authors to provide new insights that arise from an integrative review of literature, these insights should not guide the paper or be the focus of the paper, as they are a theory or conceptual paper (that might be published in AMR). The review should be first and foremost in an ANNALS paper.
What is the journal's submission and publication schedule?
ANNALS reviews proposal submissions twice a year (mid-March and mid-October). Proposal deadlines for the next available issue are given on the journal's homepage. All proposals are reviewed at the same time, shortly after the submission deadline (see below for more about the review process). ANNALS is published twice a year (January and July).
What is the journal's Open Access Policy?
ANNALS participates in Green Open Access. Please visit AOM Open Access for more information.
How do I subscribe to ANNALS?
ANNALS subscription orders for the Academy of Management should be directed to:
Academy of Management
P.O. Box 361
Birmingham, AL 35201-0361
Toll-Free Number: 1 (800) 633-4931
Telephone: (205) 995-1567 (Outside the U.S. and Canada)
Fax: (205) 995-1588
What is the journal's impact factor?
ANNALS is ranked #1 in the category of Management and in the category of Management with an impact factor of 9.28 and a 5-year impact factor of 17.1 (2017 Journal Citation Reports).
Questions about Submitting Your Work to ANNALS
ANNALS has a two-stage submission process. First, authors submit a proposal describing a potential full-length manuscript that they may write. Second, if a proposal is accepted by the editorial team, authors will be asked to submit a full-length manuscript based on the accepted proposal. Details about each of these stages is given below.
What kinds of proposals are a good fit for ANNALS?
Proposals that are a good fit for ANNALS describe an extensive and integrative review of a management literature that identifies some themes, patterns, or insights not evident from a cursory reading of the literature, and that enhance understanding of the topic of the review. These themes, patterns, or insights should also suggest directions for future research that would broaden the impact and reach of the literature. To construct such a proposal, there should be a significant supply of published empirical and theoretical research on the topic. In addition, the proposal should identify any reviews in the same or similar areas published in the last 10–15 years, and clearly articulate how the proposed review would differ from these extant reviews. Finally, a good proposal will articulate a problem that the review will solve and why it is important to solve that problem. Merely pointing out that a review of the literature has not been performed (or not performed for a number of years) is not sufficient justification for a proposal's acceptance.
What are the page limits for proposal submissions? How do I format my submission correctly?
ANNALS proposals should be no longer than 5 pages, single-spaced with standard 1-inch margins and in a 12-point font. References, article elements (including tables, figures and graphs) and CVs are not counted in the 5-page threshold and can be included at the end of the proposal. Please see the "Annals Style Guide for Authors" for detailed information about proposal formatting.
What is the review process at ANNALS? Are submissions blind reviewed? When will I hear back about my submission?
Proposals are reviewed by two associate editors and one editor-in-chief. The peer review process at the proposal stage is a blind-reviewed process, and the reviewers (who are ANNALS associate editors) do not see the CVs of authors that are submitted with the proposal. Proposal decisions go out approximately 45 days after the deadline for submissions.
Why do I need to include CVs of all authors with my proposal submission?
CVs are included to ascertain the expertise of the proposal submitters in the area of the review. It is important to note that submitters need not be "senior scholars" with an extensive publication record. Rather, including CVs is a way for reviewers to make an assessment of the expertise of the submission team as a whole in studying the topic area of the review.
Do I need to include a cover letter with my proposal submission? Can I request reviewers and/or an associate editor?
A cover letter is completely optional. You can request reviewers and/or an associate editor, and we will do our best to accommodate you, but we cannot guarantee it.
Can I submit a proposal to ANNALS that has been reviewed and rejected previously?
ANNALS does not accept submission of a previously rejected proposal in revised form. The guiding principle here is the literature on which the proposed review is based. In a sense, the literature one reviews is the ANNALS analogy of data for empirical journal submissions. Just as empirical journals such as AMJ do not accept submission of a paper based on data on which a previously rejected paper was based, ANNALS does not accept proposals for a review of a literature for which an earlier proposal was rejected from substantially the same author team. When there is overlap in the literature reviewed but not complete overlap, the extent to which a literature reviewed is too similar to qualify for new submission or different enough to qualify for a resubmission is an assessment made by the editors. When you submit a proposal based on the same literature as a previously rejected proposal on the assumption that the literatures reviewed are different enough, ANNALS expects you to alert the editors to this overlap and the submission history in a cover letter.
What are the reasons for a proposal desk reject?
Proposals are desk rejected if (a) they do not meet the submission formatting guidelines (e.g., they exceed the length limits, they do not include the 6 areas outlined in the "proposal guidelines"), (b) they do not fit with ANNALS's mission (e.g., they are primarily theory pieces, opinion or editorial pieces, empirical papers, or meta-analyses), or (c) they substantially overlap with a previously submitted and rejected proposal, and have not be given a "reject and resubmit" response by an editor-in-chief.
What happens if my proposal is accepted? What is the process for submitting a full manuscript?
If your proposal is accepted, you will be assigned an associate editor, with whom you will work on your full manuscript. You will typically have 4–6 months from the time of proposal acceptance until your first full manuscript draft is due. This manuscript will be reviewed by your associate editor and one editor-in-chief, but will not go out for blind review by any other reviewers. Multiple revisions of full manuscripts are common before acceptance. It is also important to note that acceptance of a proposal does not guarantee that a full manuscript will be ultimately accepted for publication. While rare, full manuscripts are rejected if they do not fulfill the promise of the proposal or are deemed inappropriate or inadequate in quality for publication.
What are the formatting guidelines for full manuscripts? Is there a page limit for full manuscripts?
Please see the "Annals Style Guide for Authors" for full details on formatting full manuscripts.
Manuscripts should be limited to no more than 25,000 words in total, including all tables, figures, appendices, footnotes, and references.
View the AOM Ethics policy page, which includes the Academy of Management Code of Ethics and detailed Procedures and Inquiry requests.