Updated Member Portal Launching 18 November
AOM Systems May Experience Downtime Through 17 November
Systems requiring member login may be affected during this period.
Thank you for your patience. Click here for more information.
The Sydney Morning Herald: Penalised for having a work-life balance?
Originally found at The Sydney Morning Herald, by James Adonis
Many employees, depending on the organisation they work for, are spoilt for choice when it comes to work-life balance entitlements. These often include flextime, job sharing, working from home, generous leave and more. So why, then, do so few people take them up?
According to a fresh analysis published in the prestigious Academy of Management Review, this appears to occur because employees worry about career penalties that might result from doing so.
It’s otherwise known as “flexibility stigma”, the effects of which can be evidenced by numerous prior studies that demonstrate the lower wage growth, poorer performance evaluations and limited career advancement that afflict those who request work-life balance benefits.
This trend apparently arises because bosses expect employees to be devoted to their job. A request to spend less time in the workplace is therefore sending a signal that work no longer plays a central role in the employee’s life. They’re consequently penalized for making such decisions, for even daring to ask.
Continue reading original article at The Sydney Morning Herald.
Read the original research in Academy of Management Review
Learn more about the AOM Scholars and explore their work:
- Ellen Ernst Kossek, Purdue University
- Brenda A. Lautsch, Simon Fraser University